On a side note, when people are speaking forign languages, its good they put (B) or [L] as prefix... some spell out Balok, Luktar.. some even spell out what they sound like. This is great at first, but it doesnt need to be repeated every sentence when the people in the area do not change... Even if you just say [Speaking in Luktar] and then type away, saves you some time
I prefer the tagging of every text.
Reason? Not everybody who "hears" the dialogue is there from the beginning and just walks up later - and how would that one notice that he would not understand a word?
And... you really can never know who's listeing or if someone else may hear you
I'm not sure if that's right, it's been a while sinc ei found that referance in the books, but it's something like that.
you'd also probably sound like a 4yr old trying to speak the language as is it only a *Basic* understanding.
[/quote]
Probably. It depends on the degree of immersion. But if this is limited to what you learn after 6 months, you are most likely right. As a more pragmatic approach, i would deduct the level of understanding from the roll and by how far it exceeds the result required for basic understanding.
Example:
Basic DC is 25, reduced by 18 after a total of 24 months of immersion. So the modified DC is 7.
The roll is 18, exceeding the DC by 11. This indicates much more than a basic understanding, but it would surely not suffice for passing as a local or a scholarly dispute (let's assume that something like a barovian scholar exists
)
Well... this is at least how knowledge rolls work... and since i am not sure about learning languages, this is just a suggestion.