[written in Reikspiel]
It has been weeks since my last entry. A deserved break, I suppose, but the time for rest is ever too brief.
I am used to the argument of moral equivalence; it is common to divorce action from context and thus equivocate over differences. To be painted as a villain for striking at villains is merely an occupational hazard. Nonetheless, there is a visceral difference between killing a man guilty of murdering children and of torture, and killing an innocent man; or a man of lesser, pettier crimes.
My hands are not free from blood; but my conscience is clear. Then why is this case different? Why does it make me feel uneasy? Inari suspected I was rationalising fear, but it's not that; nothing so simple.
Perhaps it is because of the timing of it. Senies and his cohorts massacred fifty guards, yes, but only weeks beforehand, numerous Morninglordian faithful were slaughtered by -- whom, exactly? Agents of the Count? Senies, this Romar, Count Strahd; all have the blood of Barovians on their hands. Yet which is the worse? The ones who slaughtered those men in battle, or the one who slaughtered bystanders merely to make a point? Soldiers are killed in wars.
How petty in this light, how besides the issue, is being accused of "hypocrisy" over murdering villains. No, the true hypocrisy is that we dare not reach high enough. We tell ourselves we suffer the tyrant's laws because we have little choice; rebellion means death if we fail and chaos if we ever succeeded. Better to crawl in the dark places and do what little good we can than to waste our lives in some fruitless romantic gesture.
It is an easy line of reasoning to accept; so, so, so many here do. But it is increasingly hard to ignore the shadow of moral cowardice this projects upon all our other undertakings. I try to tell myself that politics is not, never should be the domain of a College Wizard; that my duty is solely about containing and neutralising threats of a magical nature. But reality is not so clean, so precise; it never was.
Perhaps then there is some secret part of envy and admiration to all this: that they dare defy the Count where we do not. If this is true, then can I admit it to myself? And if so, what does it mean?