It is a shame for me to have to start responding in multi-quote style, because I think breaking down each sentence detracts from the use of common sense and seeing the big picture, but here I am.
Think what you wish, but this is the easiest and clearest way to debate a specific point. It has nothing to do with common sense or a big picture.
Sometimes I think you just reply for the sake of replying, without stopping to think about what you're really saying. The rarest of items. You're arguing that because you can't use gold to buy the rarest item in the game, that gold "doesn't have much purchasing power." Money doesn't buy everything, not even in the real world. This economy isn't "hyperinflated" because I can't buy a +3 amulet or +2 gi.
I'm at work. I have a lot of time on my hands, and debating on the forum is my way of staying sane.
Seriously though... Money can buy everything in a real world economy. That's why things sell for millions, billions, and trillions of dollars. There may be some folks that will hold out for a trade, but that's usually only in a case where they know the other person has no where else to turn to for getting that particular item. The value of gold on the server
has been watered down from an overabundance. Now, not everyone has a crap ton of it, but that's not the issue of this thread, nor does it disprove that we are suffering from hyperinflation. The fact is that you can't buy said amulet or gi because of hyperinflation. Money has become less useful and folks want a more valuable commodity in exchange for rare items.
People will say any economy isn't functioning for them if they don't have everything they could ever possibly want. I thought you were hardcore. People shouldn't be catered to because they think their thousand gold doesn't buy as much as it should.
I am hardcore, and not catering to anyone. I want to see more realistic sytems and simulations, especially those affected by our playerbase's influences. I am also saying our economy isn't functioning properly.
You argue my point for me. How would it be a punishment or a burden on anybody if gold held no value?
I am not saying the gold had no value. Whether it was 1 fang, or 1 million fangs, I would use the dead character's money for the raise. It's the principle of the matter, not the expense.
I don't think you understand how this works.
When we talk about players who have insurmountable amounts of gold, we're talking about players that sell. Those rich players are rich because of other players, not because there's a ton of gold everywhere and it's easy to farm. That's about as effective as a video game economy can get.
What do you think players are doing standing outside in the outskirts all day with items on the ground? As long as players are selling items in exchange for gold, gold has value. If I know I can buy a stack of true seeing potions for 2000 gold, 2000 gold has a specific value to me.
I understand quite well. The problem isn't the fact that rich characters are getting rich selling things. The problem is that they have little to spend it on. (Casters even less so, because they need less consumables.) Merchants should make money, though, and I don't argue that. I made a lot of money with Torgan selling crafted goods. I earned it. I spent weeks grinding away at smithing and gilding to get to that point. I felt like my time was worth something.
But the economy is messed up. I wouldn't be surprised if on an average day that 50,000 gold pieces are brought into circulation from dungeoning, questing, etc. If we had a stable economy, we'd be sinking just as much every day through expenditures like NPC raises, item customizing, NPC purchases, etc. But that's not the case. Arguing that our current system is "as effective as a video game economy can get" is rediculous when we have Soren and the other Devs that can tinker with the economic systems we have in place.
Sounds like your characters are self-sufficient, but that's a personal problem. Taking an arbitrary amount of gold from everyone by adding a gold sink isn't going to make gold have any more value to you, because with what little you would still have, you still wouldn't have anything you'd want to buy.
At this point, it seems you are only offering opinions, and not actually debating anything. You also seem ignorant of economics, so there is no point in me debating with you further.